> On 4 Nov 2014, at 10:49, Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de> wrote: > > Am 04.11.2014 um 07:48 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> writes: >> >>> If the simple-fraction components of a compound time signature respected >>> the time signature style, would that qualify as useful or as undesirable? >>> For example, >>> >>> 2 + 3 2 + 3 4 >>> ----- + C vs. ----- + - >>> 4 4 4 >> >> Undesirable in my book. >> > > I overlooked the fact that the denominators are the same, ...
It could be interpreted as a compound meter 2+3 followed by one in 4, indicating that the metric accent on 4 should be stronger than the one on 3. This is different from 2+3+4, which means that it is unspecified, or possibly that they are about the same. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
