On Nov 29, 2014, at 18:48 , Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote: > > Oh, so you meant let the Scheme portion dictate to partcombine_iterator which > _input_ voice, as it iterates the music expression produced by \partcombine, > to use.
My reasoning probably needs more clarification. The iterator takes sequences of events and routes them into voices. So, I thought that where now the Scheme portion produces simply ‘unisilence, it might produce something like (’silence “shared” #f) to tell the iterator that both parts are silent, the first part should be placed into the voice named “shared”, and the second part should be dropped. That’s what I meant by telling the iterator which output voice to use. Telling the iterator which input to use would be something like defining new states ‘unisilence1 and ‘unisilence2. — Dan _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
