On Jan 29, 2015, at 00:07 , Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote:
> 
> Shucks.
> The similar issue with Accidentals (issue 3646) was not so bad.
> There we could look up the stencil one, put it in the 'stencil property like 
> usual for purposes of line spacing, and then just after line-breaking remove 
> the accidentals on notes tied to a previous note on the same line.
> 
> I had hoped that for Rests we could look up a tentative glyph and put it in 
> the 'stencil for use in spacing, then after the last step of vertical 
> position is done, substitute the ledgered glyph when appropriate.
> 
> I'll try to look at the new patch over the weekend, but if you didn't see a 
> way to untangle the tangle I'm not likely to either.

You’re overestimating the value of my experience.  I’m still working with 
blinders on when it comes to Lilypond.  I’ll take a look at the accidentals.  
Thanks.
— 
Dan
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to