Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > Am 08.02.2015 um 17:35 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: >> >>> * One of the most crucial project is missing from the list: Guile 2.0 >>> migration. Here it is the other way round: David has explained why >>> this actually would be a good GSoC project. >> I think it has ceased being a good GSoC project since I have fixed all >> the low-hanging fruit already. The main problem now is a fundamental >> change in GUILE 2.0 garbage collection that is inherently incompatible >> with our data structures. Getting this under control is a single quite >> hard task which probably, to a good degree, has to be tackled by the >> GUILE programmers themselves. I am currently doing preparatory work for >> that. >> > > Ah OK. Does that mean it's becoming more probable to have this in the > foreseeable future or rather the contrary?
It means that people said they wanted to take a look at it. It's not the first time, however. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
