On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:14 PM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Now, a function to get a grob's name would certainly be useful. I'm sick > to death of constantly recreating it or looking it up (as I bet you are)! > If there's a question of usefulness, I think we've established the need... > > The benefit of doing this in C++ is that there's probably something in > place already and it will get automatically documented in the Scheme > functions list. >
Yup--there's Grob::name. Couldn't resist--patch up for ly:grob-name. --David _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel