On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:14 PM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Now, a function to get a grob's name would certainly be useful.  I'm sick
> to death of constantly recreating it or looking it up (as I bet you are)!
> If there's a question of usefulness, I think we've established the need...
>
> The benefit of doing this in C++ is that there's probably something in
> place already and it will get automatically documented in the Scheme
> functions list.
>

Yup--there's Grob::name.  Couldn't resist--patch up for ly:grob-name.

--David
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to