On 2015/02/18 18:57:21, dak wrote:
On 2015/02/18 18:53:03, c_sorensen wrote: > On 2015/02/09 23:46:45, thomasmorley651 wrote: > > > > > I'd happily do it, though, why alpabetically? And why only for the
lines
with > > \accept, could be done for the context-defs as well. > > And it's also thinkable to sort it following context-hierarchy:
first
> > bottom-contexts like Voice, then Staff up to Score and Global. > > Or vice versa... > > > > What do others think? > > Alphabetically. The only reason for sorting them is to make it easy
for a
human > to find. Context-hierarchy requires me to know the context
hierarchy, which I
> likely don't know fully. Alphabetically is trivial for me to look. > > Carl
Alphabetically is not feasible for context defs since several context
defs are
based on previously defined context defs that are not preceding them
in
alphabet.
So /accepts sorted alphabetically, and context defs sorted in definition order? Carl https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel