Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >> If it's too much trouble, I guess it might be preferable to drop the >> idea with the boolean values again, as it isn't really that crucial >> for the intended functionality anyway. > > This is OK with me. I only wonder whether it's better to follow > David K's advice to use `hollow-duration-log-min' instead of > `hollow-duration-min'...
Uh, yes? Possible that it needs to be named `hollow-duration-log-max' then, though since larger logs correspond to smaller durations. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
