> On May 2, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > > I think you should submit this code as a patch to scm/stencil.scm. Also, > the regtests should be fixed to show the new behavior. > > Using a scale of -1 is the appropriate thing to do when you want to have > the *origin* stay in the same location. Using stencil-flip is the > appropriate thing to do when you want the *bounding box* to stay in the > same location. > > Both behaviors could be desired.
Ok, will do. Thanks, -Paul _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
