>>>There's lots of differences, presumably down to font changes, >> >> Also sans \bold and \italic do not seem to work in >> font-family-override.ly > > Well, I call uh-oh. It will probably take a few more unstable releases > to shake out the problems from the font setup changes.
Probably, it caused by URW fonts problem and/or Pango version. In my experiment, with newest URW fonts release (commit date is 2015-08-28) and newest Pango (version 1.36.8, 2014-09), there is no problem. Attached file is the result. First, the previous URW fonts release (commit date is 2015-08-25) seems broken. It has "Nimbus Sans Regular", "Nimbus Sans L Bold", "Nimbus Sans L Regular Italic", "Nimbus Sans L Bold Italic". Only "Regular" font's family name is "Nimbus Sans" but others are "Nimbus Sans L". http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696089 http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git;a=commitdiff;h=ee2beed6 The newest URW fonts release has no "Nimbus Sans" but "Nimbus Sans L". http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git;a=commit;h=c983ed400dc278dcf20bdff68252fad6d9db7af9 Next, we use old Pango (version 1.28.3, 2010-09) in GUB. In four years, many bugs would have been fixed. So I'll make a GUB's patch that updates URW fonts and Pango. Would I create an Issue on tracker? How can I do so? Or, would someone create it?
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
