David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > The main problem I see is that questions like the usefulness of the > documentation, scalability under duress, helpfulness of community, > design of the codebase don't really gain a reliable answer before > taking a full plunge.
I was missing a clear conclusion: given that (and other points I raised), it is to be expected that exploring some option reliably is likely going to take around 3 months. So deciding on which option to explore next should be done with careful deliberation. A somewhat reasonably working interim solution will buy us the time. Given the effort already invested in Allura and the reached state, continuing with the current effort seems like our best bet for that goal to me. Has anybody asked for a DNS alias bug-lilypond.gnu.org yet? That would likely solve our certificate problem completely, and in the mean time at least Firefox allows for making certificate exceptions and our developers should vastly prefer accepting an "unfitting" *.gnu.org certificate over using unencrypted connections with their credentials. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
