Hi,
>> For me the question arises: what to expect from this syntax:
>> \new Voice << { c''^~ c'' } { a'_~ a' } >> ?
>> Two voices in the same voice?
>
> How would LilyPond start new voices when it's already at bottom level?
Excatly, that was my question.
> When at bottom level, << >> without \\ is just a temporal rearrangement
> tool.
Ok. So after this being confirmed, I wonder why would one use such a
syntax? I mean, you will always find border cases that are still allowed
by the parser but still make no sense and therefore throw warnings for
syntax that would work in a more sensible context.
At first I thought tie directions (^_) would not work without chords,
but they do for single notes, inside chords and for whole chords as I
would expect it.
So, sorry Simon, this is not meant to be rude, it just seems like I
don't understand your problem.
Cheers,
Joram
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
