Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes:

> On 22.01.2016 02:13, Dan Eble wrote:
>>> text-replacements: add &auml; and the like
>>> Provides aliases auml,Auml,ouml,Ouml,uuml,Uuml
>>> They were wanted by a user, so why not provide them?
>> I don’t want my observation to hold back this change if everyone
>> else likes it, but this looks like a slippery slope.
>
> What’s the danger that you see?

There is a whole lot of character entities in Unicode.  Several hundreds
of thousands I think.

> The alternative would be to deprecate using this input method.

Why?

-- 
David Kastrup

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to