Hi Simon,

> You should have come back to the entire quote: ‘And I think the double
> items suit the advanced functionality better (advanced in comparison to
> printing a hyphen character from a font).’ I didn’t mean ‘advanced’ in
> the sense of ‘only for advanced users’ or ‘rare’.

I know. I'm sorry to misuse the quote a bit. Your sentence just made me
want to write what I was thinking before – even though it did not fully
fit to your statement.

> But three characters versus four characters to type doesn’t seem enough
> of a difference to justify the change.

That might well be true. I am undecided myself. I think I like the
single hyphen (syl - la - ble) still ;)

Cheers,
Joram

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to