Hi Simon, > You should have come back to the entire quote: ‘And I think the double > items suit the advanced functionality better (advanced in comparison to > printing a hyphen character from a font).’ I didn’t mean ‘advanced’ in > the sense of ‘only for advanced users’ or ‘rare’.
I know. I'm sorry to misuse the quote a bit. Your sentence just made me want to write what I was thinking before – even though it did not fully fit to your statement. > But three characters versus four characters to type doesn’t seem enough > of a difference to justify the change. That might well be true. I am undecided myself. I think I like the single hyphen (syl - la - ble) still ;) Cheers, Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel