Am 27. Oktober 2016 04:40:14 GMT-07:00, schrieb David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > >This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >> > >If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order: > >1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ... > >while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to >bottom, assignments should be more like > >1/2, 3/1/2, 3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4/6 ... > >namely keeping the small voice numbers for the inner voices. Now I am >sort of afraid that changing this is likely to end pretty disruptive to >existing scores. Even though I don't know how many really use the >original ordering unchanged as well as intentionally. > >Thoughts?
I just stumbled over this for the first time recently (because I usually use the othe construct with explicit voices). I found it disturbing that I can't define the voices from top to bottom but have to apply a seemingly wrong ordering. This doesn't help you but I wanted to express some confirmation. Urs -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
