Worth an entry in changes? Some wording-nitpicks, otherwise LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/311430043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/311430043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode2210 Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:2210: style. It is intended for editions that are used both by singers that only The wording feels not very elegant. Though, I'm a non-native speaker... https://codereview.appspot.com/311430043/diff/1/scm/music-functions.scm File scm/music-functions.scm (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/311430043/diff/1/scm/music-functions.scm#newcode1847 scm/music-functions.scm:1847: ;; that the first alteration within a voice (as opposed to on the wording again, maybe: Similar to piano, except that the first alteration within a voice is always printed (as opposed to within a staff). But again: non-native-speaker https://codereview.appspot.com/311430043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
