Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > Am 15. Februar 2017 13:03:55 MEZ schrieb Trevor Daniels <tr...@treda.co.uk>: >> >>Urs Liska wrote Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:04 AM >> >>> Am 14.02.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Trevor Daniels: >>> >>>> As these functions are not intended for the usual LilyPond user I >>>> don't think the NR is suitable, other than to have them listed in >>A22. >>>> Similarly, they will also be listed in the IR under Scheme >>functions. >>> >>> Are they listed there really? >>> I was of the impression that the ly:something functions defined in >>> Scheme are *not* documented anywhere. >> >>You're right. I was misled by the title of A.22 - "Scheme functions". >>Having explored how this is generated it seems these are actually >>scheme-callable functions written in C++, if I understand it correctly. > > Yes, these are the functions created by LY_DEFINE in C++ files. > > If I recall correctly there was discussion about auto-documenting > "real" Scheme functions too, but I don't know where this went ...
Maybe we should look for some indicator in the doc string? I think that a number of Scheme function doc strings are just not suitable for running through Texinfo. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
