On 2017/04/28 22:27:12, david.nalesnik wrote:
On 2017/04/28 22:24:57, david.nalesnik wrote: > On 2017/04/28 16:15:42, david.nalesnik wrote: > > On 2017/04/28 15:50:52, dak wrote: > > > Does an extra-offset in X direction even make sense when the
systems are
> > spaced > > > according to their skylines _before_ the extra-offset is
applied?
> > > > Well, X-offset of line-break-system-details is applied in
make-page-stencil,
> > too. > > In any case, having an extra-offset in the Y direction is obviously
much more
> useful. Extra-offset in the X direction seems a bit superfluous,
since it's
> easy enough to set 'X-offset based on the left edge of the printing
space.
Or, rather, I would imagine that the extra-offset setting for X would
be the
same as X-offset....
> My > original code created an extra-Y-offset, and I'm happy to go back to
this.
> > Opinions?
If I understand correctly the default systems X/Y-offset is calculated elsewhere, I like the possibility to offset those values. So I'd vote for keeping extra-offset as in your last patch-set. Although I'm aware David K's point is important, I think a user doing manual positioning, is responsible to deal with possible problems (collisions), too. https://codereview.appspot.com/324810043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
