On 2018/03/20 12:56:37, dak wrote:
On 2018/03/16 19:19:15, thomasmorley651 wrote: > Can't review this one. > Though, from description, I'd like to suggest to put up an entry in
`changes'.
Ugh. Documentation for \etc is sort-of sparse, and the main problem
for
"Changes" is "which Changes"? \etc in general is a 2.20 feature and
this fits
pretty well within that framework. But it's as to yet not tested all
that much. Apart from wrong estimations (including my own), I don't remember any reported problem with \etc. So I vote for putting all in 2.20. https://codereview.appspot.com/336670043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
