On 2018/04/10 17:21:43, Malte Meyn wrote: > make slashturn 4% thinner at the center (instead of 10% thicker)
IMHO that’s an improvement.
Yes, I agree.
> haydnturn 0% > thicker (instead of 10% thicker)
I’m not sure whether this is, the glyph shouldn’t be too slim to match
the
overall style of the Feta font.
You're probably right. I am a little confused as to my eye-sight - even after I checked that the glyph is completely symmetric, I "feel" that the \haydnturn's right part is "steeper". At one point I thought it might be an optical illusion triggered by the note head below, but that's not the case (as can be seen by deleting that note head). So it's probably best to forget my remark after all. Anyway, this was not influenced by your change of thickness, so you might just as well follow your judgement about what look of the symbol matches the Feta 'flavour'. https://codereview.appspot.com/340660043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
