On May 12, 2018, at 16:17, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > > Does our code base use the optional second parameter anywhere? If not, maybe > it would be even simpler to eliminate the optional second parameter, and just > call > > warning (_f (. . .), origin); > > and keep all the testing for a null pointer in the warning function.
Carl, I’m pretty confident I can enable that syntax, though there is a chance the implementation will be perceived as too clever; but since you mention it, I’ll give it a try and see how it turns out. Thanks, — Dan _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
