On 2018/11/11 10:57:31, thomasmorley651 wrote:
On 2018/11/10 12:53:18, dak wrote: > I wonder whether it might be reasonable to just have all markup
commands with
a > last argument of markup? produce their last (recursively treated)
argument as
> default, and possibly all markup list commands with a last argument
of
> markup-list? similarly produce their last argument? That leaves
fewer
commands > to cater for and would also make some user-defined commands work
reasonably
> well.
I think I do not fully understand what you mean.
More a case of me talking about stuff I know nothing about.
'all-relevant-markup-commands' tries to get all markup-(list-)commands
where
'markup->string' may return reasonable output.
I have to get used to the thought of not having the monopoly on good ideas. That's all. I had assumed that you work with large lists of markup commands and rules rather than this kind of deduction and didn't even bother to check. Sorry for the noise. https://codereview.appspot.com/347000043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
