Hi Urs!

So what can I do to check whether make lilypond succeeded or failed?


The last lines of the terminal output will look like:

   make -f lilypond.make update-versions

   To upload, run:

        make lilypond-upload LILYPOND_BRANCH=master 
LILYPOND_REPO_URL=git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git

   **** nsis rule
   python bin/gub tools::nsis
   calculating dependencies
   Checking for iconv ... /usr/bin/iconv
   Checking for g++ ... /usr/bin/g++
   Checking for gcc ... /usr/bin/gcc
   must rebuild[tools]: system::gcc system::g++ system::iconv
     *** Stage: pkg_install (cross/gcc-core, linux-x86)
      cross/gcc conflicts with cross/gcc-core
        non-core cross/gcc already installed
          skipping request to install cross/gcc-core
      cross/gcc-doc conflicts with cross/gcc-core
        non-core cross/gcc already installed
          skipping request to install cross/gcc-core
      cross/gcc-runtime conflicts with cross/gcc-core
        non-core cross/gcc already installed
          skipping request to install cross/gcc-core

     *** Stage: pkg_install (glibc-core, linux-x86)
      glibc conflicts with glibc-core
        non-core glibc already installed
          skipping request to install glibc-core
      glibc-doc conflicts with glibc-core
        non-core glibc already installed
          skipping request to install glibc-core

   done
   **** rest rule
   **** all rule
   **** Default rule
   make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/knut/sources/gub'

if everything worked fine.

In uploads you see the generated installers, the documentation, test results 
etc:

   drwxr-xr-x 2 knut users      4096 29. Jan 08:56 signatures
   drwxr-xr-x 4 knut users      4096 29. Jan 08:56 localdoc
   drwxr-xr-x 4 knut users      4096 29. Jan 08:56 webdoc
   -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users 137828875 29. Jan 08:56 
lilypond-2.21.0-1.webdoc.tar.bz2
   -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users 158089031 29. Jan 08:55 
lilypond-2.21.0-1.documentation.tar.bz2
   drwxr-xr-x 4 knut users      4096 29. Jan 08:34 webtest
   -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users  18416327 29. Jan 08:31 
lilypond-2.21.0-1.test-output.tar.bz2
   -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users  17226394 29. Jan 08:28 lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
   -rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users  31251820 29. Jan 08:27 
lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
   -rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users  28063129 29. Jan 08:27 
lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
   -rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users  30586997 29. Jan 08:27 
lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
   -rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users  31375293 29. Jan 08:27 lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
   -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users  34665510 29. Jan 08:26 lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
   -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users  26746205 29. Jan 08:25 
lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
   -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users  26611149 29. Jan 08:25 
lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
   -rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users  31208955 29. Jan 08:24 
lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh

If you reached that point everything went fine.

At least we hope that everything went fine.

When we will start to update relevant components like guile we will need a way 
to test if the generated archives contain a working lilypond or garbage. I see 
that you already thought about that by providing the generated files on your 
cloud. Thanks you.

Knut
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to