On 2019/02/28 09:41:26, lemzwerg wrote:
[Oops, pressed the wrong button]
The idea of
\fermata 'foo
is its open endedness; you don't have to define a new command for a
new fermata
type. I'm a fan of a smaller set of multiplex commands instead of a
larger set
of specific macros (which a user could always define by herself).
However, this
is probably just me.
Hm … Would this apply to the already existing script commands \shortfermata etc.? Then we would need a convert-ly rule. And maybe we should take that opportunity to add a very short fermata and the Henze variants to comply SMuFL: https://w3c.github.io/smufl/gitbook/tables/holds-and-pauses.html https://codereview.appspot.com/344160043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
