"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> > To: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> > Cc: "John Mandereau" <john.mander...@gmail.com>; "Lily devel" > <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 7:09 PM > Subject: Re: Can GUB-build stable/2.20 [was Re: Still cannot build GUB > with stable/2.20 branch] > > >> >> On typical UNIX-like systems these days, a user account beowulf has both >> a user id of beowulf and a group id of beowulf. This is not a necessity >> as much as a convention making some permission management easier. >> Typical utilities creating accounts follow that permission. It seems >> like on your system, the user "lilypond" (assuming it exists) does not >> have an accompanying group "lilypond". > > > I don't even have a username "lilypond". Don't think the VM I used to > use does either.
I would be surprised if it didn't. > Not sure why it wants to change group to a non-existent entity. Does > it copy the permissions (and memberships) to the remote server? Depends on what commands are used for copying. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
