Il giorno dom 31 mar 2019 alle 17:22, Valentin Villenave
<valen...@villenave.net> ha scritto:
On 3/31/19, Valentin Villenave <valen...@villenave.net> wrote:
I couldn’t reproduce (but then again I’m not running Ubuntu). I
also
find it odd that only some scores are reported to fail while
other’s
aren’t.
OK, as I suspected *all* scores do indeed fail for this user.
Further information just in case: LilyPond 2.19.83 has been
decompressed to /usr/local, and there’s gs 9.26 installed in
/usr/bin
(as a dependency for the distro-provided LilyPond 2.18, I’d guess).
So where "gs revision 9.21" comes from?
As far as I can see from my installations, gs distributed in
lilypond.org recent installers is version 9.26.
Even if in the GUB spec I read 9.21:
https://github.com/gperciva/gub/blob/master/gub/specs/ghostscript.py#L22
On Fedora 29, both system's and lilypond's gs are 9.26:
$ gs --version
9.26
$ .local/lilypond/usr/bin/gs --version
9.26
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
