On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 3:10 PM Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > Hi everyone! In working on 64-bit Mac builds of lilypond, I notice, > > to my surprise, that lilypond and lilypond-devel exist in MacPorts > > for 2.18.2 and 2.19.83 respectively. I'm experimenting with these > > builds (as well as other approaches), but does anyone know anything > > about them? > > I've never tried the `lilypond' port; the `lilypond-devel' port was > updated by me (and I still maintain it)
Oh, that’s good to know. > > > Any pitfalls I should be aware of? > > I don't think so. All information is in the Portfile, I believe. > > However, the package dependencies are not perfectly set up (and I > don't have time right now to work on it): The categorization into > needed build-only, run-only, and build-run packages is not fully > correct. For directly using lilypond-devel this is of no importance, > but for creating binary tarballs it makes a big difference. Yes, I can believe that. The ideal end result of this, of course, is a binary .app bundle with no external dependencies. > > > Werner Best, > > -- Marnen Laibow-Koser mar...@marnen.org http://www.marnen.org Sent from Gmail Mobile _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
