Begin forwarded message: > > Subject: [testlilyissues:issues] Re: #5564 Fix conversion warnings in beaming > code > Date: October 10, 2019 at 12:08:48 EDT > I'm sorry to contribute to your frustration. I can see what the process is, > but my question (which I direct to LilyPond developers in general) is whether > it is justified that make check run to completion using an out-of-date > lilypond rather than either rebuilding it first or raising some kind of > alarm. Must we continue to put up with it? > > The purpose of make is to follow dependencies and do exactly what needs to be > done. The difference in behavior between these cases seems contrary to that: > > make && make check > make check — Dan
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
