I understand. Thanks for your answers.
Erlend > On 8 Jan 2020, at 13:51, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Erlend Aasland <erlen...@innova.no> writes: > >> Right, so we’re sticking with 1.8 for now. Have we ever considered >> throwing out Guile and replacing it with something else? (Yes, I know >> that would be a huge operation.) > > Replacing Scheme with something else would be a completely different > application. Using a different Scheme interpreter would not be easier > than using Guile-2.x . > > -- > David Kastrup
