Am Samstag, den 18.01.2020, 21:34 -0600 schrieb Karlin High: > On 1/18/2020 4:59 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond > development wrote: > > I strongly dislike Gerrit, it's really hard to learn and even after > > some time I still can't figure out how to use it correctly. > > This topic is outside my expertise. But I understood that Gerrit and > Rietveld are both descendants of Google's proprietary internal-use > Mondrian code review tool. > > < > https://www.gerritcodereview.com/about.html > > > > I see quite a few patches lately that show Jonas Hahnfeld as the author... > > < > https://codereview.appspot.com/user/hahnjo > > > < > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git/log/?qt=author&q=Jonas+Hahnfeld > > > > ...so I'm wondering if Rietveld has you suffering in silence ;) or if > the fork and rewrite mentioned on that Gerrit "about" page has greatly > diverged the user experiences of these respective products?
Not sure what you're referring to here? Having tried to work with Gerrit in the past, I found Rietveld easy enough to use immediately. I'm not saying that it's the best review tool I've ever used, but relying on SF for issue management is strictly worse. And that's something that would not be tackled by switching to Gerrit. If there are enough people who prefer Gerrit, I'm open to giving it another try. But if we can get a source hosting that combines all of git, issues and patch handling, that would simplify things. Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part