On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:57 PM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:

> > As far as I can see right now, the time it takes to complete a GUB
> > build is not that important.  But the complexity of the GUB build
> > system is hugely important.  It's a big obstacle to getting
> > contributors going.
>
> Contributors don't need to bother with GUB.  GUB is just used internally
> for cranking out releases.  Nobody uses GUB when testing: instead
> LilyDev is being used.  No crosscompilation, instead cross execution
>

if GUB is used, who is maintaining and/or working on it?

I enjoy working on LilyPond a lot, but GUB is different. I want GUB to
disappear so I never have to look at it again.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
  • packaging lilypond ... Han-Wen Nienhuys
    • Re: packaging ... Carl Sorensen
      • Re: packag... David Kastrup
        • Re: pa... Han-Wen Nienhuys
          • Re... Karlin High
            • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
              • ... David Kastrup
                • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
                • ... David Kastrup
                • ... Han-Wen Nienhuys
                • ... David Kastrup
                • ... Han-Wen Nienhuys
                • ... Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
                • ... David Kastrup

Reply via email to