Jonas Hahnfeld <hah...@hahnjo.de> writes: > Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2020, 16:25 +0100 schrieb David Kastrup: >> >> > OK. So what is your proposal for how to proceed with Jonas' patch? >> >> Different possibilities. Probably easiest is to have different GUB >> setups for LilyPond-2.20 and LilyPond-2.22. Then we can stick with >> Python2 (and PowerPC installers, yuch) for as long as 2.20 is a thing >> but move on otherwise. > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2020-01/msg00041.html > -> I'd propose to just create a branch for GUB from the current > commit.
It would be my guess that a different target could be more convenient, but my GUB knowledge is close to nil. > Jonas > >> 2.20 should be out soonish, and we definitely >> don't want to have that patch gather bitrot. > > P.S.: Can't decide on a comment for this one 2.19.85 is in Phil's queue (though it's a bit unclear when it will surface) and a 2.20 window of 2 weeks was suggested by me in Salzburg for final fixes after it's out. And I don't want significant delay for 2.21.0 afterwards. Does that help you deciding on a comment? -- David Kastrup
