Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 11:08 -0500 schrieb Dan Eble:
> On Feb 4, 2020, at 11:02, Jonas Hahnfeld <
> hah...@hahnjo.de
> > wrote:
> > > That would be my impulse as well. It is not like this code appears to
> > > have notable drawbacks for the unafflicted platforms.
> >
> > Except for very funny overflows and negative signs if the value is too
> > large to fit into I64 ;-P
> >
> > unsigned long long a = 0xC0000000;
> > signed long long b = a;
> > printf("%d\n", b);
> > -> -1073741824
>
> That's already an ingredient of this recipe.
>
> class Rational
> {
> ...
> U64 num_, den_;
> ...
> I64 numerator () const { return sign_ * num_; }
>
> Yum!Oh wow... I withdraw all my objections, it's already broken if we ever reach that case. Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
