not happy with indentation yet...
https://codereview.appspot.com/571780043/diff/549620043/mf/feta-scripts.mf File mf/feta-scripts.mf (left): https://codereview.appspot.com/571780043/diff/549620043/mf/feta-scripts.mf#oldcode999 mf/feta-scripts.mf:999: .. z2l > Nevertheless, I've changed the indentation to 8 characters. Thanks. I now see that the word 'indentation' is misleading. What I actually mean is to vertically align the continuation lines as done everywhere else in the code. https://codereview.appspot.com/571780043/diff/579360043/mf/feta-arrowheads.mf File mf/feta-arrowheads.mf (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/571780043/diff/579360043/mf/feta-arrowheads.mf#newcode83 mf/feta-arrowheads.mf:83: .. reverse pat yscaled -1 Hmm. This is not the vertical alignment used in other `.mf` files. For example, at this very spot it should be arrow_path := pat .. reverse pat yscaled -1 .. cycle; this is, the `..` operator has the same indentation as `pat`. Similar indentation is often used in C code, for example. Any reason for doing it differently? https://codereview.appspot.com/571780043/
