On 2020/04/11 05:37:39, hanwenn wrote: > > In addition, I don't think that it is used to a degree where it would > significantly affect LilyPond's performance. > > It is not yet. > > My plan is to plugin this into Grob and Prob and see if there is a measurable > speed improvement. If there is none, it's likely that your double indexing > scheme will also not bring much.
I'd strongly suggest we have numbers first before introducing ~300 lines for a custom hash implementation. It's good to have the implementation available early (I haven't looked at it yet), but I think it should only be merged with strong evidence that it's worth it. https://codereview.appspot.com/559790043/