On 2020/04/13 17:22:52, hanwenn wrote: > > If you're not interested in doing this, I might try it myself. > > By structuring it like this, you enforce the implementation to store the > key/value as SCM cells, which is exactly what we want to get away from.
OK, I didn't understand that from the description. I still think it would be good for the iterator to have an interface that every C++ programmer expects from an iterator. https://codereview.appspot.com/561640043/
