Il giorno lun 27 apr 2020 alle 22:36, Carl Sorensen
<c_soren...@byu.edu> ha scritto:
git checkout $RELEASE_BRANCH
if [ 0 -eq $(git merge-base --is-ancestor $COMMIT_ID HEAD) ]; then
echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
with $RELEASE_BRANCH being the name of the branch, and $COMMIT_ID
replaced with the commit id you want to check.
I know this doesn't solve the GitLab vs GitHub issue. But it is a
way to check more easily.
I had to replace [] with the double version [[]] and still I get some
spurious output (needs two commits?):
[fede@linux lilypond-git ((release/2.21.0-1) %)]$ if [[ 0 -eq $(git
merge-base --is-ancestor 68fb45e7e20071b10c43f2a6f64681d56122e67d) ]];
then echo "true"; else echo "false"; fi
usage: git merge-base [-a | --all] <commit> <commit>...
or: git merge-base [-a | --all] --octopus <commit>...
or: git merge-base --independent <commit>...
or: git merge-base --is-ancestor <commit> <commit>
or: git merge-base --fork-point <ref> [<commit>]
-a, --all output all common ancestors
--octopus find ancestors for a single n-way merge
--independent list revs not reachable from others
--is-ancestor is the first one ancestor of the other?
--fork-point find where <commit> forked from reflog of <ref>
true
I guess I'll use Github for the time being. Much easier.
Thanks anyway!
Federico
