Am Mittwoch, den 13.05.2020, 10:24 +0100 schrieb James: > Hello > > On 13/05/2020 07:15, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > So I think we should just have some kind of policy where to discuss > > things first. > > OK would there be any objection to removing the 'countdown-specific' > labels (i.e. new/review/countdown/push) from closed issues, or issues > that have been abandoned or have duplicate by them. > > e.g. > > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues?scope=all&utf8=%E2%9C%93&state=closed&label_name[]=Patch%3A%3Apush > > > Later issues would not (or should not) have the push label assigned to > them but just 'fixed' or 'abandoned' or 'duplicate' labels. > > While I know this may generate a lot of email noise, it will make things > clearer for me. > > Ditto for those closed issues with 'review' label.
In favor for Patch::new, Patch::review, Patch::countdown, and Patch::push on closed issues. Not sure about Patch::abandoned and even less about Patch::needs_work - these might still contain some work that could be revived later on. However I haven't looked through them yet. Regarding email noise, I think only removing a label will not send notifications. We can even do so very efficiently by "bulk editing" those issues: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/bulk_editing.html Regards Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part