Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2020, 10:54 +0200 schrieb Valentin Villenave: > On 5/27/20, Jonas Hahnfeld <hah...@hahnjo.de> wrote: > > Pinging this to attention... > > Yeah, that’s one of those “I’ve read it without fully understanding > it” situations (and then the discussion devolved into James’s workflow > and I lost track). > > So IIUC there’s no way to skip the rebase-triggered CI pipeline right > now? (I didn’t quite understand if the -skip option worked or not in > that case.)
We do want to have the pipeline on the commit before it is merged because this replaces patchy. The only limitation is that all MRs are checked individually. > Or are we willing to accept situations where, in case of a fairly > trivial rebase where side-effects are absolutely unlikely, people > could manually stop the pipeline as soon as it starts, and force the > merge to happen immediately? This shouldn't and fortunately doesn't work, see above. Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
