Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >>> For me, the speed of Guile 2.x without compiled Scheme bytecode >>> would be too painful. >> >> Agreed for user installations, but we have a work-around there. So >> what about development? Do we *require* compiled bytecode to work >> there? [...] > > I don't know, really. I have zero feeling for that. Of course it > would be nice if `make doc` doesn't become much slower. Whether this > can be easily done, I have no clue.
Well, it would be sort of embarrassing to wait for the users to complain about an utterly non-working installation because they are the first to get to test a version using bytecode. -- David Kastrup
