Hi all, while colorizing the labels (let me know what you think of the first stage!), I noticed that there are some obsolete ones that should be deleted:
* Task: I *think* this comes from "Type: Task" on SourceForge and never had issues. * Cant_verify: As we don't do verification anymore, I don't think there's much gain from labeling one open and two closed issues. * Frog: Does this still provide value? Furthermore, the following labels have very few issues. I'd propose we delete them because having less labels will make it easier to find the right one: * Encoding: one closed issue about BOM signatures, fixed in 2.15.10 * Dynamics: one open issue, title mentions dynamics * Autochange: one open issue, "Enhancement: autochange improvements" * Tablature: one open & one closed issue, titles mention tablatures Moreover, I find issues in Emmentaler, Font_handling and Glyph_handling very confusing: While Emmentaler seems like a rather recent invention of Werner and makes sense to me, Font_handling and Glyph_handling overlap and I'd actually label some of the issues as Emmentaler- related. I'd propose we merge these two labels, call it "Fonts", and put into the description that everything related to Emmentaler should go there. Lastly, I don't like "-Wconversion" because it starts with a hyphen and is very specific. Can we rename this to "Compiler warnings" or just re- label the issues and MRs into Build and / or Maintainability? Once that's done, I'll try to distribute some category colors to the remaining labels, right now I'm a bit overwhelmed. Regards Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
