Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, > > some thoughts: > > A file like the attachment to > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-11/msg00757.html > would be a bit more work to convert, I suppose, although I didn't try ... > > ps-code not causing skylines, etc may be a feature in some cases and > not a problem, imho.
\with-outline and \with-dimensions-from make it easy to null any dimensions in case something like a watermark is wanted. > Regarding LSR, there are 20 snippets related to postscript. Thus we > can expect \postscript is widely used out there. > > > Thus, I'd not drop \postscript and friends without a ready-to-use and > user-friendly replacement. There is no point in dropping \postscript I would agree. There is a point in changing example code that does not need it, though, in order to make the code more generally useful, particularly since many examples are copied by users and/or used as templates. There is no point in making people depend on the PostScript backend unnecessarily. -- David Kastrup
