On 2022-06-06 5:24 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
Putting a bit more meat on what this may mean:
<https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1404>
This certainly lends some brevity being able to use operators rather
than named procedures. Providing all this is firstly correct and
secondly reasonably performant, it seems like a good addition.
That said, I did find one surprise looking at [1]. I would not have
expected 1+ (increment) to work without some way of Scheme knowing how
to construct unity for a given type. Am I just overlooking where such a
<Moment> is being specified? Or is there supposed to be a type-specific
overload of 1+? I am worried something might not have gotten committed.
[1]:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1404/diffs?commit_id=bafd55131495ad58d8c9eb4439f60c8789bc9dc8#98b870cc087eeb4becf470fa3ec9b05b85962f2f_115_109
-- Aaron Hill
