Hi all, > I am starting to think that since Frescobaldi is the most complete > and beginner-friendly LilyPond environment out there, having a good > installing experience for Frescobaldi and LilyPond together would make > the installing experience for LilyPond without Frescobaldi much less > relevant. > > In particular, > > - as I said earlier, it would be great to have a .dmg for Frescobaldi 3.2, > > - Frescobaldi could gain an interface for easily installing various > LilyPond versions, and the first launch of Frescobaldi could just > open this interface.
Love this idea. Especially as someone who just used Lilypad for far too many years after Frescobaldi was available and encouraged [by a few on the list], in large part because it didn’t feel “blessed”. Cheers, Kieren.
