>> ```
>> c''4-3 e-5 b-2 a-1
>> ```
>>
>> which Pygments translates to
>>
>> ```
>> @t{c''} @t{4} @t{-3} @t{e} @t{-5} @t{b} @t{-2} @t{a} @t{-1}
>> ```
>>
>> that is, the `-` is not typeset in bold.
>
> Because "-3" could just as well be a number rather than a fingering,
> and it's hard to guess.
>
>> The next one
>> ```
>> c''4-ˆ c-+ c-- c-!
>> ```
>>
>> gets translated to
>>
>> ```
>> @t{c''} @t{4} @tb{-^} @t{c} @tb{-+} @t{c} @t{--} @t{c} @tb{-!}
>> ^^^^^^
>> ```
>>
>> showing bold and non-bold for `-` in the same function.
>
> Because "--" could be a lyric hyphen.
OK, thanks. I wonder how the heuristics could be improved. Given
that a lyric hyphen must be preceded by whitespace, while normally
`--` as an articulation is following a non-whitespace character, maybe
a look-behind assertion for the latter would help? Something similar
could be done for numbers.
Werner
