I thought that with c7b238579b3d19c6ac2bc9e7160c803390f7bc07 as well as text marks, all meaningful cases of simultaneous mark-like events were covered, but there is a question on -user-fr about this case:
\version "2.25.0" { \repeat segno 2 { \sectionLabel "Part I" c'1 \break \alternative { \volta 1 { \sectionLabel "Part II" c'1 \break } \volta 2 \volta #'() { \section \sectionLabel "Coda" } } } c'1 } It rejects the \sectionLabel that comes at the same time as an implicit \codaMark. Should this be supported, or is there a reasoning that I am missing? Of course, for now one can use \tweak font-size 1.5 \textMark "Part II"
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature