Dan Eble <dan@lyric.works> writes: > On Jan 23, 2023, at 10:11, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> I am not saying that 0 is the best choice here. It merely appears to be >> rather cheap. I thought of * and / but the first renders sequences like >> c4*2 ambiguous and the second would at least become a mess in chord >> mode. > > Can you clarify how `c4*2` would be ambiguous? (I was about to > suggest `r*1` for your original example.)
c4*2 could be read as c4 c4 c2 if all of 4 * 2 are interpreted as individual durations. -- David Kastrup
