On mar, 2001-10-02 at 11:37, Rune Zedeler wrote:
>
> > Do you plan to put it in
> > next realease (something just like \gacen{d}) ?
>
> No, I am quite sure that this will never be implemented in lilypond.
> If one could just run ly2dvi as a filter then it would be no problem to
> run it like this, either.
>
> > Or must we always use
> > something like what you discribe here ?
>
> Yes, I guess you have to stick with that.
>
OK, maybe it's a silly question but, why ??
Is it because it's too hard to do ? (I don't know anything about
programming, but it's don't seems to be a problem!), or because, if we
decide to add a lot of this type of macro, lily will be too big / slow ?
I don't know how it's work, but can't it be possible too add a second
"package" with this type of extra feature ?
In spite of, thank's for this trick.
nemo.
--
Olivier Guéry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
