On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > I think it is the proper solution. For example, the difference between > (pseudo-syntax)
Hmm! I know from my own programming: It is a problem to change such fundmental things. But how would you transcribe this ? (Note this can happen frequently in obligato (strings) parts in light music): < c1 ~ e ~ g > | < c ~ e ~ a > | < c d ~ f ~ a > | < d f g ~ b > | < c ~ e g > | < c d fis! a > | > > <c~ e g~> < c e g> > > and > > <c~ e~ g~> <c e g> > > > is very small, and likely to be unnoticed. Separate voices are much clearer. > -- J.Anders, Chemnitz, GERMANY ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
