"Simon G. P. Bailey" writes: > i'm also starting to get my teeth into lily 1.8 syntax. as always, the > output is looking great. :) a suggestion: would it be too hard to hack > convert-ly to convert prefix notation to postfix notation?
Yes, we will look at conversion to postfix syntax before it becomes mandatory (in 2.0). It may need the user's attention, though. > (also, convert-ly only converts up to 1.7.24 atm). LilyPond 1.8.0 converts up till 1.7.28; the last syntax change made. > a question: iirc, HaraKiriStaff context always left the full score in > the first system (in order to show all instruments, even if only one or > two are playing). has this been changed? This would be desirable behaviour, but I doubt LilyPond ever did this. > of course my feeble memory may be tricking me here... :) It would be interesting to find out. What lilypond version did you use before? Do you have a test case? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user