"Simon G. P. Bailey" writes:

> i'm also starting to get my teeth into lily 1.8 syntax. as always, the
> output is looking great. :) a suggestion: would it be too hard to hack
> convert-ly to convert prefix notation to postfix notation?

Yes, we will look at conversion to postfix syntax before it becomes
mandatory (in 2.0).  It may need the user's attention, though.

> (also, convert-ly only converts up to 1.7.24 atm).

LilyPond 1.8.0 converts up till 1.7.28; the last syntax change made.

> a question: iirc, HaraKiriStaff context always left the full score in
> the first system (in order to show all instruments, even if only one or
> two are playing). has this been changed? 

This would be desirable behaviour, but I doubt LilyPond ever did this.

> of course my feeble memory may be tricking me here... :)

It would be interesting to find out.  What lilypond version did you
use before?  Do you have a test case?

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org



_______________________________________________
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to