* Ferenc Wagner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Debian Sid packages of Lilypond 1.9.8 are available from > > my website: > Could you make the sources available, too?
Sorry, I couldn't make it for 1.9.8, but I did for 2.0. They are already in my website > I will try to follow with Woody packages, then. That's great! > Also, do you perhaps know a way to build the lilypond deb only, not > the docs? No I don't. I guess it doesn't compile only the docs "out of the box". to do that one has to comment out the related code in debian/rules. Would be nice to be able to do that without much pain, thought. > Or is it the font generation which takes long, and leaving the > documentation out will not buy me much? I'm not sure, but I think _both_ take a looooooong time to compile. Anyway, it takes 2 hours to compile lilypond (binary and doc) in my box (amd duron 900, 320 Megs). But I really would like to know how long each "thing" takes to compile. > And further, what does it depend on whether a package is considered > part of stable or unstable? should be stable only, but some packages are unavailable like guile 1.6 :( It's kind of messy, and to be very honest, I haven't done much to help in that respect. When a new release come out I just download, edit the debian/changelog file (otherwise it won't compile) and upload to my website. I'm looking forward to create the debian-snapshot package and try to make the development builds less "hacky". > Whatever it is, I should probably change it. I think so. Pedro _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
